Elle's Education
Throughout the movie Legally Blonde there is an
indirect emphasis on how gender influences the way we think and act in the
classroom. A couple of scenes in the movie support Deborah Tannen’s argument
about gender roles in the classroom. Tannen explains throughout the article, How Male and Female Students Use Language
Differently, that males have no problem speaking up and females shy away
from it. Elle’s confidence plays a key role defining the type of student she
is. In the scene with Professor Stromwell Elle is the typical dumb blonde,
female student. Elle was unexpectedly called on but forgot to do the assignment
so the professor kicks her out of the classroom. Tannen mentions in the article
how most women fear public humiliation, which Elle felt in this scene. However,
if a guy were put in this exact situation he would probably walk out without
looking back. The following class, Professor Stromwell calls on Elle again.
Although she looks uneasy and nervous, Elle was able to correctly answer the
question. Elle had thoroughly read the required reading but being put on the
spot made her doubt her knowledge. This brings us back to the topic of
confidence. Elle came into Harvard with low self-esteem because she did not
feel as though she was worthy of an Ivy League school. However, throughout her
time at the university she gained confidence, which we see in the scene with
Professor Callahan. This scene consists of Warner sharing his opinions on a
sperm donor case. He has no problem speaking up and even gives off a cocky
smirk after he talks. However, Elle had the courage to dispute what Warner had
to say and ultimately won over the opinion of Professor Callahan and the rest
of the class. Warner slides down in his seat embarrassed to lose to his ex, let
alone a girl. Although this example does not exactly support Tannen’s argument,
it displays how things could be different if females had the confidence to make
their case. Instead, females tend to shy away from threatening situation and
things that would “challenge” them. This movie allows the audience to take on
two very different perspective of gender in the classroom. Elle is portrayed as
a timid female who has trouble speaking up and later on portrayed as a
confident female more then willing to speak her mind. This is one of the many reasons
this movie is entertaining and moving. However, the scene with Warner and
Professor Callahan does not stay true to Tannen’s theory.
This movie is all about a woman trying to find who
she is and where she is headed. Throughout each scene we see Elle grow as a
student and as an overall person; Elle gradually changes from an incompetent,
self involved, shallow, sorority girl to an intelligent, capable, motivated
woman. Though her changes may be apparent in other aspect of the movie, it is
truly visible in the classroom scenes. As mentioned previously, confidence is a
huge factor in the classroom environment and Elle was able to achieve her
dreams based on her confidence and drive to do better. If all girls became more
confident, they would find themselves speaking a whole lot more in the
classroom and overall improve as students.
Legally Gendered
Throughout the film Legally Blonde, featured many different representations of gender. The film is based in Harvard Law Graduate School and shows plenty of aspects of college education. Legally Blonde was surrounded by gender stereotypes that relate to the essay written by Deborah Tannen. The film had many scenes where common college concepts and gender behaviors became very apparent.
Legally Gendered
Throughout the film Legally Blonde, featured many different representations of gender. The film is based in Harvard Law Graduate School and shows plenty of aspects of college education. Legally Blonde was surrounded by gender stereotypes that relate to the essay written by Deborah Tannen. The film had many scenes where common college concepts and gender behaviors became very apparent.
In
this particular scene in Legally Blonde, Elle is attending Professor Callahan’s
lecture. He asks Elle “would [she] rather have a client that committed a crime
malum in se or malum prohibitum?” Elle responds “neither… I would rather have a
client who’s innocent.” The students erupt in laughter over Elle’s response.
Professor Callahan states “dare to dream Miss Woods” then proceeds to ask
Elle’s rival Vivian the same question. Vivian gives Elle a side eye then
responds, “Malum prohibitum, because then the client would have committed a
regulatory infraction as opposed to a dangerous crime.” Professor Callahan praises Vivian as she flaunts
her engagement ring from Elle’s ex-boyfriend in her face. Before Professor
Callahan can continue with the lecture Elle raises her hand. He calls on her
and Elle says, “I changed my mind. I'll take the dangerous one,
because I'm not afraid of a challenge.”
Tannen
states in her essay How Males and Females
Use Language Differently, “speaking in a classroom is more congenial to
boys’ language than to girls’, since it entails putting oneself forward in
front of a large group of people, many of whom are strangers and at least one
of whom is sure to judge speakers’ knowledge and intelligence by their verbal
display.” This was evident with Elle in the previous stated scene. Elle was
chosen to answer a question by her professor and was laughed at by her peers
with her response. This begs the question, if a male student was put into
Elle’s place would his response be laughed at? Tannen would agree because it is
more congenial for males to put themselves on display to be judged.
Tannen
stated that more males than females like “ritual opposition: public display
followed by argument and challenge.” She also says “It’s not that females don’t
fight, but that they don’t fight for fun. They don’t ritualize opposition.”
This claim is true based on Elle’s rebuttal to Vivian’s answer. Elle didn’t
want to challenge Vivian, but after she flashed her engagement ring Elle took
that as an invitation to challenge her. Elle doesn’t ritualize opposition like
Tannen mentioned, but since Vivian made it personal with the engagement ring
Elle had an impulse to publically challenge her.
Legally Blonde displays learned concepts about college education. In the scene Professor Callahan randomly picked Elle out of all the students in the class, which happens constantly in education. Also in previous scene, Elle waits to be recognized before she gives her rebuttal. This is learned behavior that you should raise your hand and wait to be called on. Tannen stated, “One’s sense of timing, of one’s rights and obligations in a classroom, are automatic, learned over years of interaction.” Being in a school system for 16+ years can reiterate concepts like raising your hand or being randomly picked. This scene briefly touched on common concepts, learned or instinctual, that exists within college education.
Legally Blonde displays learned concepts about college education. In the scene Professor Callahan randomly picked Elle out of all the students in the class, which happens constantly in education. Also in previous scene, Elle waits to be recognized before she gives her rebuttal. This is learned behavior that you should raise your hand and wait to be called on. Tannen stated, “One’s sense of timing, of one’s rights and obligations in a classroom, are automatic, learned over years of interaction.” Being in a school system for 16+ years can reiterate concepts like raising your hand or being randomly picked. This scene briefly touched on common concepts, learned or instinctual, that exists within college education.
As Tannen says in her article, How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently, behaviors are different for men and women. She makes a claim stating that it’s easier for men to speak in front of larger groups and easier for women to speak in front of smaller more personal groups of people. This is seen often in college classrooms today. The difference being huge lecture classes with 100 plus students and smaller classes like our URWT class with 20 or so students. With that being said, have you ever noticed who speaks up the most in your large classes or any class in general?In my movie Neighbors, Seth Rogan’s character is a new father and a younger married man who lives next to a newly arrived fraternity. When the fraternity moves into the house next door to Rogan, his wife and young baby, the younger couple tries to be cool with the fraternity guys. Their plan is to be cool with the guys but also let them know to keep the noise down sometimes. When approaching the frat house Rogan has his hat turned and his wife has Ray Ban style sunglasses on. He uses language that he thought was popular slang such as “Yo” and “what up” thinking he’s acting hip in front of guys younger than him. He was also the first one to speak to the guys, supporting Tannen's claim. When I saw this scene for the second time all I could think of was my parents and how they try to act cool around my friends. Growing up I had the parents who tried to be cool around my friends but in my opinion failed miserably most of the time. Just like Tannen said though, men usually can talk better in larger groups so my mom would send my dad when I had multiple friends over. Then my mom would come downstairs after dad or when I had one or two friends over. I guess she just felt comfortable with a few of my friends while my dad didn’t really care who they were or how many friends were over at the house. Plus the fact that my guy friends liked my dad and thought he was cool probably helped. I thought them being so lame wasn't a normal thing but after seeing this movie I see that maybe it was. The way this associates to college education is that I don’t think that Tannen’s claim is correct. In the few months that I have been here at UNC Charlotte I have noticed that women in fact speak up more in classes than men, especially freshman girls I don’t know why but it’s what I have observed. My claim disagrees with Tannen’s claim yes but I think that maybe this will change as we get older.
As stated my group’s previous blogs, the image/ perception
of a practice, institution, program or person is important. The image can
easily effect the public’s perception of said image. Having an image that is
less than favorable can prove to be harmful to the development of society.
Something genuine like charity or a non-profit organization should not be
looked down upon because of one unfavorable incident. This blog is dedicated
showing how images can be exaggerated in a negative or positive way to the audience
being the public perspective in this case. Society rarely looks to the real
original source of what they are being told about which in some cases creates
something worse than stereotypes… ignorance. Ignorance or the lack of knowledge
will never have a positive effect on anyone especially those who can really
benefit from what the stereotype denounces. This blog will attempt to give very
persuasive examples of one of the most stereotyped aspects of our society.
Education is seen as a right to passage part of today’s society. This makes
education highly sought and respected. Today’s society is very rebellious which
invites the threat to education when its purpose is challenged. Tannen
describes todays society by pointing out specific reasons such as sex and
upbringing. This ties into the movie I chose to write about.
Accepted
The movie Accepted also featured stereotypes of the typical Ivy League school with the fictional school Harmon College. The dean of Harmon College stated, “Rejection. That's what makes a college great. The exclusivity of any university is judged primarily by the amount of students it rejects.” This is widely believed by many prospective and rejected students. Many prestigious schools seem like they send out more rejection letters than acceptance, which makes the school look even more luxurious. The dean was overly obnoxious with how he wanted Harmon College to be elite, to the point where he wanted to bulldoze South Harmon Institute of Technology just to make a park-like gateway to “keep knowledge in and ignorance out” Accepted mentioned stereotypes of college education in general also. Accepted featured students trying to break from the norm of most institutions to create their own.
Accepted
The movie Accepted also featured stereotypes of the typical Ivy League school with the fictional school Harmon College. The dean of Harmon College stated, “Rejection. That's what makes a college great. The exclusivity of any university is judged primarily by the amount of students it rejects.” This is widely believed by many prospective and rejected students. Many prestigious schools seem like they send out more rejection letters than acceptance, which makes the school look even more luxurious. The dean was overly obnoxious with how he wanted Harmon College to be elite, to the point where he wanted to bulldoze South Harmon Institute of Technology just to make a park-like gateway to “keep knowledge in and ignorance out” Accepted mentioned stereotypes of college education in general also. Accepted featured students trying to break from the norm of most institutions to create their own.
A professor of South Harmon
Institute of Technology stated “we throw a lot of fancy words in front of these
kids in order to attract them to going to school in the belief that they're
going to have a better life.” This could describe many universities across the
globe. College is assumed to provide students a leg up in life than just
receiving a high school diploma. Although a college degree can help you achieve
many comfortable occupations, some degrees leave you wondering where to go from
there. The phony professor also said, “You know a lot of people say that
college is a time when young men and women expand the way that they look at
their world. When they open their mind to new ideas and experiences and when
they begin that long journey from the innocence of youth to the
responsibilities of adulthood. The movie addressed sexism by overcoming it in
their alternative college. All students played a part in the certification of
the institution. This is a different but a much better approach in comparison.
to other plots and settings of movies.
Blog 1- Elle's Education
ReplyDeleteI think you had a very effective post and I really liked how well you tied in Tannen's claims to the movie. Although I personally disagree with Tannen's claims about women being timid or lacking confidence to speak up, you make it clear that this was a problem throughout the movie that Elle grows to overcome. You chose a really good scene to represent her confidence growth.
For Elle's Education: I liked how you talked about how Elle had low self confidence going into Harvard, then throughout time she was more confident and spoke up more in class. I like the scene that you used because it does show that at first Elle didn't know what to do and was shy, but eventually she got used to arguing her points across and being heard.
ReplyDeleteFor Legally Gendered: First of all I think your title is very creative! I like how you were able to connect your scene back to Tannen's claim and it helped you make your claim strong as well.
ReplyDeleteBlog 2- Legally Gendered
ReplyDeleteI agree with Michael, I really like your title. I also think you did a very good job tying Tannen's claims in with the scene that you chose, especially where you talk about learned behaviors in the classroom. These things seem so natural to us now as students that we don't even think about them any more. You also make a good point when you talk about ritualizing opposition and public challenge.
Blog 3- Neighbors
ReplyDeleteI can definitely relate to your post because my parents did the exact same thing. When I would have friends over and we were being too loud, my dad would always be the first one up to say something to us and threaten to send my friends home. I think it was partially because my mom didn't want to be the bad guy. They always tried to be "hip" though which was so embarrassing but I'm used to it now. I think you did a really good job incorporating Tannen's claims about gender in with your article, even though you disagree with her (I do too.)
Keilah, I thought your analysis of the scene really showed the preconditioned attitudes towards female students from both the teacher and the women. The teacher clearly has accepted the prejudice that women law students do not have important things to say. The women, however, are simply falling into the patterns that society may have reinforced: avoiding public speaking or confrontation. I am intrigued that the women initially began the verbal confrontation in reaction to a stereotypical conflict over a man. That in itself seems to limit the possibilities of these female characters. Of course the rest of the movie is empowering as Elle develops her resolve to work hard and hang with the "boys." The real question may be does she succeed in becoming a string woman or does she just get good at playing the male game.
ReplyDeleteBlog 4- Accepted
ReplyDeleteI wish you would have tied in Tannen's claims about gender earlier in your post, but overall it think it was effective because you compared it to the movies before yours. Being that your movie supported individuality and didn't seem to have so much of a problem with gender, I can see why you wrote it the way you did. I agree with you when you say that this is a much better approach.